Comments on: Shadow CSS Theme Available http://scalenine.com/blog/2007/02/22/shadow-css-theme-available/ The latest about ScaleNine Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:26:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Jason Rubenstein http://scalenine.com/blog/2007/02/22/shadow-css-theme-available/#comment-173 Jason Rubenstein Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:10:23 +0000 http://scalenine.com/blog/2007/02/22/shadow-css-theme-available/#comment-173 Nice.. looks really good! It looks especially nice with a "Eurostile" font as well. Dark themes have a place, aesthetically, and can be very attractive. IMO, as long as any text-intensive component remains dark-letters-on-light-bg, they're a lovery choice. Nice.. looks really good! It looks especially nice with a “Eurostile” font as well.

Dark themes have a place, aesthetically, and can be very attractive. IMO, as long as any text-intensive component remains dark-letters-on-light-bg, they’re a lovery choice.

]]> By: juan http://scalenine.com/blog/2007/02/22/shadow-css-theme-available/#comment-171 juan Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:47:07 +0000 http://scalenine.com/blog/2007/02/22/shadow-css-theme-available/#comment-171 Yes, I figured that might happen. It's because I have Monaco specified as the fontFamily in the "global" style attributes. You can always specify a different font when you download the CSS. global { fontFamily: (Your fontFamily goes here); } I'll fix it. Yes, I figured that might happen. It’s because I have Monaco specified as the fontFamily in the “global” style attributes.

You can always specify a different font when you download the CSS.

global {
fontFamily: (Your fontFamily goes here);
}

I’ll fix it.

]]> By: Thijs Triemstra http://scalenine.com/blog/2007/02/22/shadow-css-theme-available/#comment-163 Thijs Triemstra Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:44:36 +0000 http://scalenine.com/blog/2007/02/22/shadow-css-theme-available/#comment-163 It looks like the font is missing, the live demo on the windows version of firefox 2 doesn't look like the screenshot? It looks like the font is missing, the live demo on the windows version of firefox 2 doesn’t look like the screenshot?

]]>